🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters praising your advice on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Dozens of women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment recently following popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who use online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with comparable "assertive" language

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after one week, stating "Every day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants encountered favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread posts based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."