🔗 Share this article

In my role as a game master, I traditionally avoided extensive use of luck during my tabletop roleplaying games. I preferred was for the plot and what happened in a game to be determined by deliberate decisions as opposed to random chance. Recently, I decided to try something different, and I'm incredibly happy with the result.

The Inspiration: Observing a Custom Mechanic

An influential podcast features a DM who regularly calls for "luck rolls" from the players. The process entails selecting a polyhedral and defining possible results based on the result. While it's essentially no different from rolling on a random table, these are created spontaneously when a character's decision lacks a predetermined outcome.

I opted to test this method at my own session, primarily because it looked engaging and presented a change from my standard routine. The outcome were eye-opening, prompting me to reflect on the often-debated dynamic between preparation and spontaneity in a roleplaying game.

An Emotional In-Game Example

During one session, my group had concluded a massive battle. Later, a player inquired after two key NPCs—a brother and sister—had made it. In place of choosing an outcome, I asked for a roll. I told the player to roll a d20. I defined the outcomes as: a low roll, both died; a middling roll, a single one would die; a high roll, they made it.

The die came up a 4. This resulted in a deeply moving sequence where the characters came upon the remains of their allies, still united in death. The group performed a ceremony, which was particularly meaningful due to earlier story developments. In a concluding touch, I chose that the NPCs' bodies were suddenly restored, containing a enchanted item. By chance, the item's magical effect was precisely what the party lacked to address another major quest obstacle. It's impossible to orchestrate these kinds of perfect story beats.

Sharpening DM Agility

This event led me to ponder if randomization and thinking on your feet are in fact the beating heart of tabletop RPGs. Although you are a meticulously planning DM, your improvisation muscles can rust. Players frequently excel at derailing the most detailed plots. Therefore, a effective DM has to be able to adapt swiftly and invent content in real-time.

Utilizing similar mechanics is a great way to practice these abilities without venturing too far outside your preparation. The strategy is to use them for minor decisions that have a limited impact on the session's primary direction. As an example, I would avoid using it to determine if the main villain is a traitor. Instead, I might use it to determine whether the party reach a location moments before a critical event unfolds.

Strengthening Collaborative Storytelling

This technique also serves to make players feel invested and cultivate the impression that the game world is alive, shaping in reaction to their decisions in real-time. It reduces the perception that they are merely actors in a rigidly planned script, thereby enhancing the shared aspect of roleplaying.

This philosophy has long been embedded in the game's DNA. Early editions were filled with random tables, which fit a playstyle focused on exploration. Although current D&D tends to focuses on story and character, leading many DMs to feel they must prep extensively, it's not necessarily the required method.

Striking the Sweet Spot

Absolutely no issue with being prepared. However, equally valid no issue with relinquishing control and allowing the dice to guide minor details in place of you. Authority is a major part of a DM's role. We require it to run the game, yet we frequently find it hard to cede it, in situations where doing so can lead to great moments.

My final advice is this: Have no fear of relinquishing a bit of the reins. Embrace a little randomness for minor outcomes. You might just create that the organic story beat is significantly more rewarding than anything you might have planned by yourself.